MANAJEMEN RISIKO BENCANA ALAM DAN RENCANA KONTINGENSI PADA HARI PEMUNGUTAN SUARA DI TPS: STUDI KASUS DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46874/s5yhvb85Keywords:
perubahan iklim, manajemen risiko, tata kelola Pemilu, rencana kontingensi, TPSAbstract
Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan menghadapi peningkatan risiko bencana iklim yang sulit diprediksi dan berpotensi mengganggu tahapan Pemilu, sehingga diperlukan tata kelola Pemilu baik dari sisi institusional maupun koordinasi lintas sektor untuk memitigasi dampaknya. Penelitian ini menelaah kerangka institusional tata kelola Pemilu Indonesia dalam menghadapi bencana alam dengan fokus pada manajemen risiko dan rencana kontingensi, khususnya pada hari pemungutan dan penghitungan suara di TPS. Menggunakan metode studi kasus di Kabupaten Banyumas, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem manajemen risiko dan rencana kontingensi pada tahapan tersebut masih rapuh secara institusional dan koordinatif. Pemetaan TPS rawan bencana dilakukan untuk mengidentifikasi risiko, sementara mitigasi dilakukan dengan membangun TPS tanggap bencana. Namun, prosedur BPBD dan SAR belum terintegrasi dengan rencana kontingensi penyelenggara Pemilu (KPPS, PPS, PPK). Oleh karena itu, pengalaman dan kapasitas bersama antara penyelenggara Pemilu dan aktor penyelamatan perlu diperkuat melalui kerangka institusional dan koordinasi lintas sektor yang lebih matang.
References
Abramov, V., Popov, N., & Shilin, M. (2021). Geo-information Support Tools for Natural Risks Management within Northern Sea Route. Transportation Research Procedia, 54, 144-149
Alihodžić, S. (2023). Protecting Elections: Risk Management, Resilience-Building and Crisis Management in Elections. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/protecting-elections-risk-management-resilience-building-and-crisis
Ambarkhane, S. (2024). Natural Hazards and Elections in India: Lessons in Adaptation and Mitigation. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/natural-hazards-and-elections-india-lessons-adaptation-and-mitigation
Asmorojati, A.W., et.al. (2024). Systematic literature review of postponed elections during COVID-19: Campaigns, regulations, and budgets. Heliyon, 10, 1-13
Asplund, E. (2024). Mapping Disasters and Responses during Elections. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025 dari https://www.idea.int/news/mapping-disasters-and-responses-during-elections
Asplund, E., & Harty, M. (2025). The Impact of Natural Hazards on 2024 Elections. Dalam James, T.S., Garnett, H.A., & Asplund, E. (Eds.), Review of the 2024 Super-Cycle Year of Elections (hlm. 115-128). Stockholm: International IDEA
Baerlocher, D., et.al (2025). Natural disasters and voting behavior under authoritarian regimes: Evidence from the Brazilian shrimp vote. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 234, 1-21
Bertoldo, R. (2021). A comparative frame for a contextualised analysis of local natural risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 52, 1-5
Birch, S., & Coma, F.M.i. (2023). Natural disasters and the limits of electoral clientelism: Evidence from Honduras. Electoral Studies, 85, 1-11
Birch, S., & Fischer, J. (2022). Wildfire and Elections in California. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/wildfire-and-elections-california
BNPB. (2025). Data Bencana di Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: Pusdatin BNPB
Bodet, M.A., Thomas, M., & Tessier, C. (2016). Come hell or high water: An investigation of the effects of a natural disaster on a local election. Electoral Studies, 43, 85-94
Cerqua, A., Ferrante, C., & Letta, M. (2023) Electoral earthquake: Local shocks and authoritarian voting. European Economic Review, 156, 1-30
Coma, F.M.i. (2023). Managing Elections During Floods: The Case of Victoria, Australia. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/managing-elections-during-floods-case-victoria-australia
Crawford, M.H., et.al. (2018). Risk modelling as a tool to support natural hazard risk management in New Zealand local government. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 610-619
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, London dan New Delhi: Sage Publications
Demirdogen, A., & Olhan, E. (2024) Fifty-four thousand deaths, zero electoral impact. Public Choice,
Eriksson, L.M. (2016) Winds of Change: Voter Blame and Storm Gudrun in the 2006 Swedish Parliamentary Election. Electoral Studies, 41, 129-142
Eriksson, K., & McConnell, A. (2017). Contingency planning for crisis management: Recipe for success or political fantasy? Policy and Society 30, 2011, 89-99
Fernandes, F.H.C., et.al. (2024). Discussions on developing a contingency plan for landslide associated disasters in developing countries– Perspectives from Belo Horizonte municipality, Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 110, 1-15
Gallego, J. (2018) Natural disasters and clientelism: The case of floods and landslides in Colombia. Electoral Studies, 55, 73-88
IPCC. (2023). Sections. Dalam: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. Jenewa, Swiss
James, T.S., (2021). New development: Running elections during a pandemic. Public Money & Management, 41, 65-68
James, T.S., & Alihodžić, S. (2020). When is it democratic to postpone an election? elections during natural disasters, covid-19, and emergency situations. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19(3), 344-362
James, T.S., et.al. (2023). Elections During Emergencies and Crises: Lessons for Electoral Integrity from the Covid-19 Pandemic
Kirchner, M., & Krott, M. (2022). Making science-based natural hazard risk management work within power networks –from co-production models of knowledge transfer to the Research-Integration-Utilisation (RIU) model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 82, 1-19
Kronborg, A., et.al. (2024) Do green parties in government benefit from natural catastrophes? How wildfires are linked to voting. Electoral Studies, 88, 1-12
Lee, S. (2025) When Elections Wait: A Cross-National Analysis of Election Postponement During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Political Research Quarterly, 78(1), 151-167
Liao, Y., & Junco, P.R. (2022). Extreme weather and the politics of climate change: A study of campaign finance and elections. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 111, 1-22
Masiero, G., & Santarossa, M. (2021). Natural disasters and electoral outcomes. European Journal of Political Economy, 67, 1-19
Ni, Z., et.al. (2019). Knowledge model for emergency response based on the contingency planning system of China. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 10-22
Page-Tan, C., Fraser, T., & Bourdeau, M. (2024). Democracy in distress? Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on voter behavior in the 2020 general election in the Greater Boston Area. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 112, 1-17
Permana, Y.S. (2022). Taming the Twin Hazards: Indonesia’s 2020 Direct Local Election. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/taming-twin-hazards-indonesias-2020-direct-local-election
Redhani, M.E., et.al. (2025). Postponement of General Elections Due to Emergencies: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Cambodia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 204-223
Sijapati, S., et.al. (2025). Needs and uses of scientific information for earthquake and monsoon contingency planning by humanitarian clusters in Nepal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 117, 1-15
Stout, K.R. (2018) Weathering the Storm: Conditional Effects of Natural Disasters on Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections—A Replication and Extension. Research and Politics, 5(4), 1-6
Thaler, T., Attems, M.S., & Fuchs, S. (2022). Bottom-up innovations in natural hazard risk management in Austria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, 1-12
Towriss, D. (2022). The Impact of Natural Hazards on Haiti’s 2010 Presidential and Legislative Elections. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/impact-natural-hazards-haitis-2010-presidential-and-legislative-elections
Vincent, A., Alihodžić, S., & Gale, S. (2021). Risk Management in Elections: A Guide for Electoral Management Bodies. Diakses 8 Agustus 2025, dari: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/risk-management-elections-guide-electoral-management-bodies
Wei, G., Han, G.S., & Lang, X. (2024). Using RS and GIS for risk management of natural disasters consequences: The case of cultural heritage in Jinan city, China. Heliyon, 10, 1-23
Williams, C.J., et.al. (2025). A land use policy analysis method for natural hazard risk management across a regional single-family housing inventory. Land Use Policy, 154, 1-14
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Terms and Conditions of Publication
1. Author's Rights and Authorities
As an author, you (or your employer or institution) may do the following:
- make copies (print or electronic) of the article for your own personal use (not for commercial purpose), including for your own classroom teaching use;
- make copies and distribute such copies (including through email) of the article to research colleagues, but not allowed to distribute commercially and systematically, e.g. via an email list or list server;
- present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of the article to the delegates attending such meeting;
- retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work;
- include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation;
- use the article or any part thereof in a printed compilation of your works, such as collected writings or lecture notes, and other derivative works, with full acknowledgement to JEP as the original journal publishing the article;
- may reproduce material extracted from the article or derivative works for the author's personal use, but must consider the copyrights procedure.
All copies, print or electronic, or other use of the paper or article must include the appropriate bibliographic citation for the article’s publication in the journal.
2. Requests from Third Parties
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the article in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use. Requests for all uses not included above, including the authorization of third parties to reproduce or otherwise use all or part of the article (including figures and tables), should be referred to KPU by going to our website at https://journal.kpu.go.id/.
3. KPU Copyright Ownership
KPU owns the copyrights to reproduce, distribute, disseminate, translate, and other uses in accordance with the existing Laws and Regulations.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Electoral Governance (Jurnal Tata kelola Pemilu Indonesia) by KPU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.kpu.go.id/index.php/TKP
If you are a nonprofit or charitable organization, your use of an NC-licensed work could still run afoul of the NC restriction, and if you are a for-profit entity, your use of an NC-licensed work does not necessarily mean you have violated the term.
