KEADILAN PEMILU BAGI CALON PERSEORANGAN KASUS PILKADA SUKOHARJO 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46874/v4p83h32Keywords:
pencalonan perseorangan, pilkada serentak, representasi politik, kesetaraan politikAbstract
Kegagalan calon perseorangan di Kabupaten Sukoharjo pada Pilkada tahun 2024 membuat kontestasi pilkada tidak ada karena hanya ada calon tunggal dari partai politik. Hal ini disebabkan sampai batas waktu akhir pendaftaran, dukungan untuk calon perseorangan tidak memenuhi batas minimal syarat dukungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode observasi, pustaka dan wawancara untuk mencari tahu kegagalan apa yang mempersulit calon perseorangan ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukan, titik kegagalan ada pada sistem verifikasi faktual yang menggunakan metode sensus bukan sampling, sehingga jumlah dukungan yang diverifikasi sangat banyak. Apalagi saat itu calon perseorangan juga belum dikenal banyak orang seperti calon dari partai politik karena minimnya sosialisasi. Verifikasi syarat dukungan juga harus selesai dalam waktu yang terbatas sehingga tim sukses kesulitan menambah dukungan. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa, tidak ada kesetaraan politik antara calon perseorangan dengan calon dari partai politik dalam representasi formalistik, dimana ada hambatan struktural dari regulasi yang lebih berat dibandingkan calon dari partai politik. Dalam pelaksanaan pencalonan pun tidak ada kesetaraan politik dalam proses demokrasi liberal dimana proses pencalonan perseorangan lebih berat ketika melalui verifikasi faktual syarat dukungan minimal. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, harus ada proses pencalonan yang adil dan proporsional antara calon perseorangan dan calon dari partai politik serta menghapus hambatan struktural dari regulasi yang diskriminatif.
References
Alif, S. F., & Firman, M. (2023). Napak tilas pemilihan kepala daerah indonesia: korelasi negara hukum yang demokratis dan amandemen uud 1945. Japhtn-Han, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.65
Asrun, A. M. (2023). Burden Proof Dilemma of Election Disputes in the Constitutional Court. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i7.880
Banafanu, R. A., Y. V, J. R., & H, R. U. (2023). Kewenangan mahkamah konstitusi dalam penyelesaian sengketa pemilihan umum di indonesia. COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i08.1095
Daud, R. F., & Haryadi, S. (2022). Membangun Citra Positif Masyarakat terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada dalam Upaya Memperkuat Legitimasi. JOELS: Journal of Election and Leadership, 3(2), 102–111. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 2 Mei 2025 www.journal.kpu.go.id 228 https://doi.org/10.31849/joels.v3i2.9013
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fathullah, Muhtar, M. H., Yustiana, Saharuddin, & Syahbana, R. A. (2025).
Constitutional Court’s Role in Regional Head Election Disputes: Substantive Justice and Voting Threshold Challenges. Jurnal Legislasi, 18(1). //doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v18i1.30680.
International IDEA. (2010). Electoral Justice: An Overview of the International IDEA Handbook. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2010 International.
Konstitusi, M. (2015). Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/
Kusnadi, K. (2020). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Upaya Menegakkan Asas Presidensialisme Di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v5.i1.p1-20
Lim, J. (2010). Korean Constitutional Court and the due process clause. Litigation in Korea, 160–174. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805179.00013
Nugroho, I. (2022). Transformasi Konflik Pilkada Di Tanah Papua. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 4(1), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v4i1.475
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 3 Tahun 2024 Tentang Tata Beracara Dalam Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, Dan Walikota (2024).
Petit, D. (2000). Resolving Election Disputes in the OSCE Area: Towards a Standard Election Dispute Monitoring System. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Pinem, W., Arpani, P., & Nurainun. (2024). Pengelolaan Pilkada Pada Sistem Multipartai: Sebuah Tinjauan Terhadap Pelembagaan Partai Politik. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 5(2), 203– 222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v5i2.1188.
R. Nazriyah. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3).
R., R., & Kotijah, S. (2023). Pemberlakuan Ambang Batas Suara Dalam Permohonan Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Dan Wakil Kepala Daerah/ Gubenur, Bupati Dan Wakil Walikota Di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Dedikasi, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v24i1.7046
Sutisna, A. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Non-Elektoral Potensi Pemicu Konflik Pemilu Tahun 2024. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 5(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v5i1.964
Thalib, A. S. (2024). Analisis Sistematik Praktik Pemilu Hijau Di Indonesia
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Terms and Conditions of Publication
1. Author's Rights and Authorities
As an author, you (or your employer or institution) may do the following:
- make copies (print or electronic) of the article for your own personal use (not for commercial purpose), including for your own classroom teaching use;
- make copies and distribute such copies (including through email) of the article to research colleagues, but not allowed to distribute commercially and systematically, e.g. via an email list or list server;
- present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of the article to the delegates attending such meeting;
- retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work;
- include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation;
- use the article or any part thereof in a printed compilation of your works, such as collected writings or lecture notes, and other derivative works, with full acknowledgement to JEP as the original journal publishing the article;
- may reproduce material extracted from the article or derivative works for the author's personal use, but must consider the copyrights procedure.
All copies, print or electronic, or other use of the paper or article must include the appropriate bibliographic citation for the article’s publication in the journal.
2. Requests from Third Parties
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the article in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use. Requests for all uses not included above, including the authorization of third parties to reproduce or otherwise use all or part of the article (including figures and tables), should be referred to KPU by going to our website at https://journal.kpu.go.id/.
3. KPU Copyright Ownership
KPU owns the copyrights to reproduce, distribute, disseminate, translate, and other uses in accordance with the existing Laws and Regulations.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Electoral Governance (Jurnal Tata kelola Pemilu Indonesia) by KPU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.kpu.go.id/index.php/TKP
If you are a nonprofit or charitable organization, your use of an NC-licensed work could still run afoul of the NC restriction, and if you are a for-profit entity, your use of an NC-licensed work does not necessarily mean you have violated the term.
