POLITICAL CARTELIZATION IN THE EMERGING DISCOURSE ON INDIRECT ELECTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46874/01dpqw67Keywords:
political cartelization, cartel party, election mechanismsAbstract
This study examines indications of political cartelization in the emerging discourse on indirect elections in Indonesia using the cartel party model as its analytical lens. The study employs a qualitative approach through a literature review of conceptual works on cartel parties, empirical studies on political cartelization in Indonesia, and public discourse on indirect elections. The findings reveal three main arguments. First, cartelization has already appeared in direct elections through the formation of oversized coalitions that narrow political competition and reduce political alternatives. Indirect elections may intensify this tendency by shifting competition into parliamentary arenas with limited public oversight. Second, direct elections continue to function as a corrective democratic mechanism through which voters may reject candidates supported by cartel-based political arrangements. This form of public control would likely diminish under an indirect electoral system. Third, the fiscal-efficiency argument commonly used to justify indirect elections warrants closer scrutiny. The study finds that the costs of direct elections remain proportionate to the state budget while also generating significant economic multiplier effects at the local level. Rather than reducing political costs, indirect elections may instead shift open electoral spending into closed-door political transactions among political cartels in parliament.
References
Akbar, N. A. (2026, January 12). Litbang Kompas: 77.3 persen publik ingin pilkada langsung dan dipilih rakyat. Kompas. nasional.kompas.com/read/2026/01/12/10200271/litbang-kompas-773-persen-pudenhblik-ingin-pilkada-langsung-dan-dipilih-rakyat
Ambardi, K. (2008). The making of the Indonesian multiparty system: A cartelized party system and its origin (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
Aspinall, E., and Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
BPHN Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI. (2009). Laporan akhir pengkajian hukum tentang pemilihan kepala daerah [Final report on legal assessment of regional head elections].
Cipto, B. (2004). Pemilihan presiden 2004 dan kualitas demokrasi. UNISIA, 27(51), 38–47.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crouch, H. (2010). Political reform in Indonesia after Soeharto. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.
Falah, M. Z. N., Firmansyah, A. B., & Hakim, L. (2022). Metode dialektika Hegel dan analisisnya atas paradigma hukum. Kanz Philosophia, 8(2), 131–154.
Fionna, U. (2010). Developing but discriminative theories on political parties. Sosiohumaniora, 12(1), 72–85.
Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2017). Competing populisms in post-authoritarian Indonesia. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 488–502.
Isnaini. (2020). Koalisi partai politik dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia. CIVICUS: Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 93–104.
Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2025). Demokrasi tidak boleh ditarik mundur: tolak wacana pengembalian pilkada oleh DPRD! antikorupsi. org/id/demokrasi-tidak-boleh-ditarik-mundur-tolak-wacana-pengembalian-pilkada-oleh-dprd
Jahan, S., Mahmud, A.S., & Papageorgiu, C. (2014). What is Keynesian economics? Finance & Development, 51(3), 53–54.
Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.
Lane, M. (2025). Power and opposition under Prabowo’s political cartel. ISEAS Perspective, 2025(38), 1–10.
Mantalean, V. (2024, July 10). Anggaran Pilkada 2024 ditaksir tembus Rp 41 triliun. Kompas. nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/07/10/05485611/anggaran-pilka da-2024-ditaksir-tembus-rp-41-triliun
Muhtadi, B. (2024). Indonesia’s regional elections: Electoral competition limited by cartel politics. ISEAS Perspective, 2024(104), 1–13.
Nastitie, D. P. (2024). Pilkada oleh DPRD perkuat oligarki, politik uang tidak lenyap. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/pilkada-oleh-dprd-perkuat-oligarki-politik-uang-tidak-lenyap
Nurdiansyarani, R. E. (2024). Pengaruh Pemilu 2024 terhadap harapan ekonomi dan tantangan ketidakpastian. Universitas Airlangga. https://unair.ac.id/pengaruh-pemilu-2024-terhadap-harapan-ekonomi-dan-tantangan-ketidakpastian/
Nusrat, M. (2026). Mengapa publik menolak pilkada lewat DPRD? Kompas.id. kompas.id/artikel/ mengapa-publik-menolak-pilkada-lewat-dprd
Purwowidhu, C. S. (2023). Pemilu serentak berpotensi genjot perekonomian Indonesia 2024. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. mediakeuangan.kemenkeu.go.id/article/show/pemilu-serentak-berpotensi-genjot-perekonomian-indonesia-2024#
Pridham, G. (2005). Designing democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rahmawati, D. (2026). Waketum Golkar: Pilkada lewat DPRD bukan pragmatisme kekuasaan, tapi ideologi. DetikNews. news.detik.com/berita/d-8295139/waketum-golkar-pilkada-lewat-dprd-bukan-pragmatisme-kekuasaan-tapi-ideologi
Sagala, C. S. T. (2025). Dinamika koalisi politik di balik demokrasi keindonesiaan: Oposisi menjadi ancaman? VeJ, 11(1), 171–197.
Salam, H. (2025). Pelantikan kepala daerah, dominasi KIM Plus tak jamin keselarasan pusat-daerah. Kompas.id. kompas.id/artikel/pelantikan-kepala-daerah-dominasi-kim-plus-tak-jamin-keselarasan-pusat-daerah
Slater, D. (2018). Party cartelization, Indonesian-style: Presidential power-sharing and the contingency of democratic opposition. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(1), 23–46.
Surbakti, R. (2019). Peserta pemilu dan partisipasi pemilih. AIPI.
Trading Economics. (2025). Anggaran pemerintah Indonesia. Trading Economics. id.tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/government-budget#
Ulum, K. (2025, July 24). Momen harlah ke-27 PKB, Gus Muhaimin usulkan kepala daerah dipilih DPRD. Fraksi PKB. fraksipkb.com/2025/07/24/momen-harlah-ke-27-pkb-gus-muhaimin-usulkan-kepala-daerah-dipilih-dprd/
Ulum, M. B. (2020). Indonesian democracy and political parties after twenty years of reformation: A contextual analysis. Indonesia Law Review, 10(1), 29–44.
Ulya, F. N. (2025, December 5). Prabowo pertimbangkan usulan Bahlil agar kepala daerah dipilih langsung DPRD. Kompas. nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/12/05/22092961/prabowo-pertimbangkan-usulan-bahlil-agar-kepala-daerah-dipilih-langsung-dprd
Wiryono, S. (2024, December 30). Fraksi Gerindra: Tak ada salahnya kepala daerah dipilih kembali oleh DPRD. Kompas. nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/12/30/21340661/fraksi-gerindra-tak-ada-salahnya-kepala-daerah-dipilih-kembali-oleh-dprd
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Terms and Conditions of Publication
1. Author's Rights and Authorities
As an author, you (or your employer or institution) may do the following:
- make copies (print or electronic) of the article for your own personal use (not for commercial purpose), including for your own classroom teaching use;
- make copies and distribute such copies (including through email) of the article to research colleagues, but not allowed to distribute commercially and systematically, e.g. via an email list or list server;
- present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of the article to the delegates attending such meeting;
- retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work;
- include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation;
- use the article or any part thereof in a printed compilation of your works, such as collected writings or lecture notes, and other derivative works, with full acknowledgement to JEP as the original journal publishing the article;
- may reproduce material extracted from the article or derivative works for the author's personal use, but must consider the copyrights procedure.
All copies, print or electronic, or other use of the paper or article must include the appropriate bibliographic citation for the article’s publication in the journal.
2. Requests from Third Parties
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the article in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use. Requests for all uses not included above, including the authorization of third parties to reproduce or otherwise use all or part of the article (including figures and tables), should be referred to KPU by going to our website at https://journal.kpu.go.id/.
3. KPU Copyright Ownership
KPU owns the copyrights to reproduce, distribute, disseminate, translate, and other uses in accordance with the existing Laws and Regulations.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Electoral Governance (Jurnal Tata kelola Pemilu Indonesia) by KPU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.kpu.go.id/index.php/TKP
If you are a nonprofit or charitable organization, your use of an NC-licensed work could still run afoul of the NC restriction, and if you are a for-profit entity, your use of an NC-licensed work does not necessarily mean you have violated the term.
